Subscribe to our RSS feed
Blog

Have a (Fair Trade) break. Have a Kit Kat!

7 Dec 2009
Posted by Tim Purcell
Tim Purcell

Posted by Tim Purcell (Tim has posted 24 articles)

Tim has worked with PricewaterhouseCoopers and Finsbury. He has a background in media, broadcasting, auditing and commercial accounting and is a particular expert on all aspects of corporate responsibility related communications.

2 Comments

  1. Tim Murray
    Posted 18/12/2009 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    While Nestle should still come under scrutiny for all areas of their business practice, it is hard to argue that increasing and stabilizing producers’ incomes is a bad thing. However, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe the market price of cocoa is actually higher than the Fair Trade price at the moment. The real test of Nestle’s and Cadbury’s commitment to the principles of Fair Trade (not just its branding potential) will be when the the market price for cocoa drops.

    Furthermore, as Tim mentions, a danger of Fair Trade branding is that there is no distinction made between Fair Trade certified products, like Nestle’s, and producer owned brands such as Divine. The vast majority of profits from Nestle’s products are still held by the brand, whereas as in the case of Divine all profits are received by the producers. This distinction should be made clear to consumers by a Fair Trade Producer Owned Certificate or the like.

  2. Tim Purcell
    Posted 18/12/2009 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    The Fair Trade Foundation website has a lively debate on this subject. See here.

One Trackback

  1. [...] to coat a proportion of their Kit Kats in Fair Trade chocolate, discussed a few days ago in the CO3 blog, has raised an interesting point. It is clear that opponents of the company, such as the Baby Milk [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*